Sarah Palin associates angrily denounce HBO's 'Game Change'

The two-hour film portrays Palin as painfully unaware of world affairs

Oh, so it's a non-fiction biography.

"This is sick," said Meghan Stapleton, Palin's former press secretary in Alaska. "The media has gone too far.

It's starting to make sense now...how conservatives always talk about "the media" in regards to their image. Sorry, but people knew what a crime had been committed introducing Palin as candidate for VP LONG before there was a Hollywood script.

I loved the preview scene where she's asked, "Do you know why we're in Iraq?," to which she says, "I sure do...because Sadaam Hussein attacked us on 9/11!" If any of what this film portrays is close to being true, John McCain should hang his head in disgrace.

Sarah Palin associates

In other words they are being paid to say what they are told!

Sarah Palin is a RWNJ political STD of which there is no known cure. The brainless teabag trollop is fully exposed.

And she still thinks she has a chance, if the GOP/Teahadist convention falls apart when they can't agree on a candidate.

"The two-hour film portrays Palin as painfully unaware of world affairs" Air headed moronic bimbo proved that in real time when she was running for vp and since. Guess she doesn't think or remember we are in the 21 century where we have the internet, youtube and cellphones with video. But can't claim she's the ultimate DUMBASS reTHUG.......there are alot more as dumb as dirt as her out there! Like the welfare/tinfoilcrown queen and frothy the tinfoilcrown king. PLENTY MORE out there too!

I think Game Change gives Palin credit for a lot more intelligence, decency, and integrity than she ever demonstrated. If she had been portrayed as a corrupt, ignorant, woman hating bully, someone who used "religion" to dupe dumb people, then it would have been an accurate portrayal. Palin and her buddies should be thankful that her image was cleaned up for this production.

Come on Palin supporters! Really? Everyone involved in the 2008 campaign has told the same stories. Everyone except the people Palin brought in with her. Who doesn't know that the Queen of England is not the head of the British government? She couldn't figure that out after Tony Blair was in the news for over a year during the Iraqi buildup? Africa as a nation? My God. This woman is stupid. That's not an ad homien attack but the only conclusion you could reasonably deduce from facts in evidence. I think she thinks that the what newspapers do you read as a gotcha question because she can't read at all.

lol republicans complaining about a "false narrative" LOL

I can't wait until HBO does a movie about the current Tea Nutter primary.

I predict they'll get an Academy Award on that baby.

Jeez, I hope Santorium is their candidate, Obama will win be the biggest margin in history.

What a block buster movie that'll be.

Even though this is an HBO drama something tells me that it's more accurate then "The Undefeated" (that POS RW movie released which failed)

Glo, haven't seen this, but if your description is accurate, then you are right - this is MOSTLY fiction if palin comes off as anything but a narcissistic vindictive creep. This is a woman who went after an "ally" because that woman told her, IN PRIVATE, when palin was on the Wasilla city council, that chewing gum was not professional looking after a meeting. That's the kind of petty thing that can set palin off.

"I remember after the recall meeting how I was going to help her," Kilkenny told me. Palin had a habit of smacking gum during city council meetings. Kilkenny thought more people would take her seriously if she knocked it off. "So at the next council meeting, I sat next to her mom. I said, 'Tell Sarah to ditch the gum.'" And the response? "She didn't take it too well."

Could Sarah Palin despise Anne Kilkenny because Kilkenny once suggested she refrain from chewing gum? I'd like to believe it's not true. But I'm honestly not so sure.

From this article - http://www.tnr.com/article/barracuda?page=0,6

"You accepted the false narrative of a couple of people who sought revenge and fabricated a story more than three years ago, and who are now only happy to confirm their own fictitious events to rewrite history."

Gee Sarah, why for ever would they seek revenge? And this "more three years ago" thing... is there some sort of statute of limitations on this stuff?

I probably will not watch it. There are much more interesting historical figures and living through Palin's 15 minutes was excruciating enough at the time it was actually happening.

seven Palin associates offered a scathing review of the film. Though all said they had not seen the movie,

These people haven't even watched it. It reminds me of when a church group was trying to have a strip club closed. The people were talking about all the prostitution and drugs etc that happens in the club but when asked if they'd ever been inside? "Good God, No!"

Sarah resents anything that doesn't make her look and sound like she's pristine. And then it becomes the fault of the person for displaying it. Talk about narcissism! She's the poster child.

Oh, so it's a non-fiction biography.

Bingo! Please...just listen to her for five minutes.

The Boston Herald needs to pull its face out of teapublicon butts long enough to get a reality check. Of course, $arah and her sycophants don't like being presented in any manner except "Undefeated".

LOL - imagine a movie entitled "Undefeated" about $arah AFTER she contributed to losing the 2008 presidential/vice presidential election. AND after she quit half way through her governorship in Alaska in order to give speeches in order to get rich. Oh, and let's not forget that she formed a super pac in order to use the loose super pac rules to write off her daily living expenses. Y'all do know that as long as she 'acts' like she's a candidate, she has full use of the super pac money. $ara bought a house in Arizona that she can use for her 'campaign headquarters' and where almost every activity that happens in the house can be legally charged to her super pac.

L'EMP, how on earth could they do a comprehensive movie about this GOP primary season. It has been a Chinese fire drill (although I've never seen a Chinese fire drill and suspect it would be an orderly affair, so apologies for the metaphor but it's the only one that seems to fit)!

HappyToSeeYa

The Boston Herald needs to pull its face out of teapublicon butts long enough to get a reality check. Of course, $arah and her sycophants don't like being presented in any manner except "Undefeated".

The BOSTON HERALD is a rag most New Englanders won't let in their home.

Not as bad as the Manchester, N.H. UNION LEADER of course.

Making this saga into a movie... even a for-tv style movie... is like filming a train wreck then broadcasting it over and over...

I get the fascination and rubbernecking... I kinda wanted to do that when I heard about this film several months ago... but I already lived through this travesty once; why subject myself to it again voluntarily?

All that said... the Julianne Moore as Sarah sends more shivers down my spine than Tina Fey... and that was enough for nightmares...

Then again, I come from a long line of people who love the history channel... Oh so confused...

All that said... the Julianne Moore as Sarah sends more shivers down my spine than Tina Fey... and that was enough for nightmares...

Tina Fey and the SNL writers made a lot of funny @!$%# up but the true genius of her portrayal became apparent when Fey used Palin's own words in a skit parodying the Katie Couric interviews.

damn! double damn!

L'EMPEREUR du POLE NORD

HappyToSeeYa

The BOSTON HERALD is a rag most New Englanders won't let in their home.

People in Boston don't want the Herald but people across the country read its articles when they are part of blogs. Egg sucking ewww.

McCain/Palin loses in the end of the movie, also Snape kills Dumbledore.

Sorry, Palinites this isn't another Infomercial like "The Undefeated".

HappyToSeeYa

Sorry if you think my comment about the BH had anything to do with the Sarah story, it doesn't. The SP story presumedly is posted by many newspapers. I believe their articles are factual, just their editorials are RW.

All that said... the Julianne Moore as Sarah sends more shivers down my spine than Tina Fey... and that was enough for nightmares...

Tina Fey and the SNL writers made a lot of funny @!$%# up but the true genius of her portrayal became apparent when Fey used Palin's own words in a skit parodying the Katie Couric interviews.

The nightmares I meant was how the delivery of the words made them funny... but said seriously... they were horrific...

Have you seen the pictures of Julianne Moore as Sarah yet?

If this story is so false, why didn't Palin do something about it when the book came out 2 years ago? She could have sued Halperin and Heilemann for libel and Steve Schmidt for slander, but she didn't. Why? Because she knows she can't win. The only people who believe that she has been smeared are her loyal supporters who will believe anything she says. They even believed her revision of Paul Revere's ride even though every history book said something different.

The two-hour film portrays Palin as painfully unaware of world affairs

So, factual, in other words.

Exactly Nicey, she proved it every time she opened her mouth.

Think this is a bunch of fictionalized drama, Sarah? Now you know how everyone you've ever talked about feels. Do you think that something like this movie will stop this moron from spouting out crap about stuff that Obama hasn't actually done that she'll say he did?

Of course it won't, but it's further evidence of what a hypocrite she is.

The most important point to this story is this:

All the 'associates' referred too that are critical of the movie are paid staff persons employed by SaraPac.

Enough said.

How low does one's self-esteem have to be to work for a painted up clown like Palin?

L'EMPEREUR du POLE NORD
HappyToSeeYa

Sorry if you think my comment about the BH had anything to do with the Sarah story, it doesn't. The SP story presumedly is posted by many newspapers. I believe their articles are factual, just their editorials are RW.

No harm, no foul.

I read conservative papers on the Internet where they make money based upon the number of clicks on the sites. I know that some of the content is factual and I agree with your observation about the editorial/opinion pages.